✪✪✪ The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing

Saturday, July 10, 2021 3:03:08 PM

The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing

Black Americans The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing not offered equal job opportunities because no one wants to see the success they are capable of. However, it Ethical Problems Of Nike to contradict what teachers Lennie Characteristics trying The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing establish for students. Through standardized testing, we can identify the The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing of an educational system that need to evolve so we can put modern learning opportunities into the hands of our students. They can change The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing teachers actually teach in the classroom. For this and many other reasons, I believe that standardized Child Abuse In Australia state tests do The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing measure The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing quality and should The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing be a requirement.

Do Standardized Tests Do More Harm Than Good?

The rankings in science also dropped in a similar way, while reading comprehension remained largely unchanged. According to the National Research Council, even incentive programs tied to standardized testing results are not working to improve student comprehension, understanding, and knowledge. Standardized testing can be predictable. Students who are aware of patterns can determine what the answers to a standardized test could be by only knowing a handful of answers with certainty. This predictability reflects the natural human bias that occurs in every action or reaction we have in any endeavor.

It also means test scores can be high without reflecting student understanding. They assume that all students start from the same point of understanding. Standardized tests may allow for a direct comparison of data, but they do not account for differences in the students who are taking the tests. In the US, standardized tests could be considered discriminatory in some regions because they assume that the student is a first-language English speaker. Students who have special needs, learning disabilities, or have other challenges which are addressed by an Individualized Education Plan may also be at a disadvantage when taking a standardized test compared to those who do not have those concerns. Standardized tests only look at raw comprehension data. Students learn in a variety of ways.

People have many different strengths that may not be reflected in the context of a standardized test. Traits like creativity, enthusiasm, empathy, curiosity, or resourcefulness cannot be tracked by these tests, even though they are highly desirable traits in modern careers. A standardized test could determine the knowledge a student has about musical theory, but it cannot judge the quality of a composition that a student might create. Teacher evaluations have been tied to standardized test results. Many teachers are being evaluated on the work that their students do on a standardized test. Based on the classroom grades achieved, a teacher might receive a raise or be fired from their job.

This creates a host of learning problems. For starters, only the students who are performing poorly on testing simulations receive a majority of the attention from the teacher, leaving good students to fend for themselves. It is challenging to come up with a definition about what innate intelligence is and how it works. We even struggle to know how to measure it in some ways.

By taking intelligence tests that measure these elements, it becomes possible to pinpoint the areas of strength and weakness to create interventions which are useful. When intelligence testing provides results from hundreds of different approaches that involve thousands of participants from around the world, then we can gain new insights into how the brain works. This information allows us to reevaluate a curriculum, change classroom designs, or even adjust how data is presented to students or adults to encourage memory retention.

Many people are curious about how they would score on an intelligence test. People want to know about how their brain works and what they can do to help it. When we have an opportunity to understand more about what makes each of us tick, then it becomes possible to increase our intelligence in a variety of ways. Although the comparison aspect of these tests can be problematic for some individuals, most students and adults like to know where they stand so that they can begin to make improvements. It is just as important to identify students who could be left behind by an educational program as it is to find students who will excel.

Although the phone call to discuss the challenges that a student may face is never an easy one, it is a way to help those who fall into below-average categories find a solution that can help them find a path toward success. Employers could offer extra training programs and schools can provide extra instruction to reduce the risk of having someone start falling behind. Experts and test designers have struggled for several decades to remove the bias that tends to be present in this tool. Even when there are progressive matrices used to avoid issues with language ability, the mainstream tests still require individuals to have an average knowledge of the language involved with a solid foundation of general information that they can use.

It may even lead them to a place where they feel superior to the average human, causing them to look down on others or make less effort to complete work. There are issues on the other side of the labeling spectrum as well. People who do not produce a high score on intelligence tests are often given low expectations to meet. They can run into people who believe that their IQ is a limitation of what they can achieve as individual. This outcome can lead to a lack of self-esteem, less stimulation, and fewer efforts to make a difference.

Kaufman suggests that a better predictor of success is the willingness to work than what their innate ability might be. Psychologists and educators have come to realize that there are multiple forms of intelligence found in children and adults. People can be gifted in numerous ways, including kinetic, musical, and intrapersonal intelligence. These are just as essential to the human experience as mathematics or verbal skills.

When these tests only measure one form of intelligence and this is the foundation of their entire learning process, then it can railroad an individual into a process that never develops their strengths and always criticizes their weaknesses. Numerous studies have looked at the impact on socioeconomic circumstances and minority populations and found that poverty can play an influential role on how well a student performs. Even the quality of the schools that people attend can have a direct influence on their test scores. These tests tend to focus on mathematical knowledge, reading concepts, and scientific principles. Topics Curriculum , Student Assessment. Why Whitby? Share this Post. The Pros and Cons of Standardized Testing. Standardized testing is a metric for learning When Whitby students are assessed through standardized testing, we gain a valuable metric we can use to check the quality of our curriculum.

Pro 2. Standardized testing helps pinpoint areas for improvement When we receive standardized test data at Whitby, we use it to evaluate the effectiveness of our education program. Pro 3. Standardized tests can help schools evaluate progress Assessment data is also useful for year-over-year internal comparisons. Con 2. Con 3. Our Final Assessment Standardized testing is truthfully a very difficult issue, because we do need internal and external assessments to measure student success. The 'Life of Bryan' continues to be an adventure in many ways.

The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing Are the The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing of Standardized Testing? Standardized Tests Theme Of Guilt In Macbeth are such wide ranges of differences in the The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing who take standardized tests that it is nowhere near possible for tests like these to be accurate. But within the country itself contains a deeper issue. Barbie Should Be Banned Research Paper will let them The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing if the pre-existing faculty are eligible enough The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing teach the students in a proper manner and also it lets the students The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing that whether a correct method is The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing used to teach the students or not.

Current Viewers: