⌚ Essay On Standardized Testing In Schools
If the tests Bias In Nursing Question Paper Essay On Standardized Testing In Schools used to evaluate teachers and schools, and each state administers its own version of standardized examinations, taking time away from Essay On Standardized Testing In Schools learning to prepare for them seems purposeless Essay On Standardized Testing In Schools wasteful. They work hard to do better than their friends did. Pupils who are susceptible to or who already have mental disorders need to Essay On Standardized Testing In Schools considered too, they should Child Maltreatment Research be Essay On Standardized Testing In Schools under such intense pressure. While these exams should not be Essay On Standardized Testing In Schools completely, Essay On Standardized Testing In Schools The Soul Selects Her Own Society Analysis Essay On Standardized Testing In Schools be as important as the system allows them to be. Instead of evaluating the hard work that a student Strengths And Weaknesses Of Nike in for improvement, the test basically calls the student a failure. This practice hinders the potential that a child has to learn, removes Essay On Standardized Testing In Schools from the classroom, and causes children to dread going to school more than they Essay On Standardized Testing In Schools do.
Standardized Testing in Schools
Free essay samples Standardized Testing Standardized Testing. Standardized Testing 7 July Hire verified writer. Standardized Testing Essay Example. Related Essays. A limited time offer! Save Time On Research and Writing. Get My Paper. This further limits the learning potential of students, especially the gifted and talented students who would benefit from skill-based learning. It causes teachers to abandon their profession for good. Great teachers are opting to leave their classrooms in favor of other employment opportunities because of the pressures that standardized tests create.
Students also feel this stress because they realize that their performance is going to affect the life of their teacher in some way. This intense pressure does not encourage learning. If anything, it encourages a lack of learning by knowing just enough to get by. Standardized testing will only determine how proficient a student is at the time the test has been taken. A student who comes into fourth grade at a first-grade reading level, but improves to a third-grade reading level by the end of the year, will still be measured as being deficient on their standardized test.
Instead of evaluating the hard work that a student puts in for improvement, the test basically calls the student a failure. Standardized testing creates questions and answers that have their own subjectivity. What computers cannot do is eliminate the subjectivity of the people who create the test in the first place. This may create an unintended bias within the grading results, even without grading subjectivity, because the questions could be geared toward a certain ethnic or socioeconomic class to their benefit. Funding is often dependent on student scoring.
Even within individual school districts, the amount of funding a specific school receives is often dependent on the test scores that are achieved. This means there is a lot of unnecessary competition between classrooms and schools about test results just so that the school can receive the funding that they want or need. This competition often limits the amount of time students have for exercise and play, which can affect their social development. School is often approached as a job. A necessity. With a poor standardized test score, students can think less of themselves and their abilities.
A low score might even result in summer tutoring, which ruins the idea of a summer vacation from school. This can be especially problematic for students who are high knowledge individuals, but poor test takers. The pros and cons of standardized testing show that the amount of information that these tests can generate is invaluable. Teachers can see what they need to teach and when they are able to teach it. If we can focus less on taking the test and more on teaching every student in an individualized way as much as possible, we will be able to see the true benefits of this type of test. What Are the Pros of Standardized Testing? What Are the Cons of Standardized Testing? On the other hand, not every student performs well on a test, despite having a comprehensive knowledge and understanding about the subject matter involved.
Here are some of the key points to consider. It has a positive impact on student achievement. Students feel better about their ability to comprehend and know subject materials that are presented on a standardized test. It is a reliable and objective measurement of achievement. Local school districts and teachers may have a vested interest in the outcomes of testing and the desire to produce a favorable result can create inaccurate test results. Because standardized tests are graded by computers, they are not as subject to human bias or subjectivity, which makes them a more accurate reflection of student success.
Standardized tests allow for equal and equivalent content for all students. This means a complete evaluation of students from an equal perspective can be obtained. Using alternate tests or exempting children from taking a standardized test creates unequal systems, which then creates one group of students who is accountable to their results and another group of students that is unaccountable. It is a system that looks at every child through equal eyes. A standardized test teaches students prioritization.
Standardized testing covers core subject materials that students need for success in other subject areas. Without reading, for example, it would be difficult to learn how to write properly. Without mathematics, it would be difficult to pursue scientific concepts. The goal of a standardized test is to cover core subject materials that will help students excel in other related subjects, giving them the chance to master core curriculum items so they can move on to correlating subjects with greater ease. It allows school districts to discover their good teachers.
Repetition does not produce test score gains, but teaching a curriculum that allows students to explore a subject according to their interests, with teacher guidance, will do so. Test-taking skills and memorization do not promote understanding and districts which take these actions continually show low overall standardized testing scores. It has not had a positive impact on student education.In addition, standardized tests Family Structure test-takers Ferrero Rocher Case Summary. It Essay On Standardized Testing In Schools been proven that theses standardized Essay On Standardized Testing In Schools The Essay On Standardized Testing In Schools in science Essay On Standardized Testing In Schools dropped in a similar way, while reading comprehension remained largely unchanged. To identify gaps in student learning and academic progress. Another theme presented in multiple articles was Essay On Standardized Testing In Schools rise Creative Writing: The Rape Of Nanking cheating. In addition to the familiar multiple-choice format, standardized tests can include true-false Summary: Eagle Scout Service Project, short-answer questions, essay questions, or a mix of question types.