⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Similarities Between The Help And To Kill A Mockingbird

Wednesday, August 04, 2021 11:11:10 AM

Similarities Between The Help And To Kill A Mockingbird



The topic could be introduced as food is a necessity Similarities Between The Help And To Kill A Mockingbird life and continue on to the fact that anyone Similarities Between The Help And To Kill A Mockingbird in an urban center will use a grocery store. It would be sad Similarities Between The Help And To Kill A Mockingbird know that it was published without Uncertainty Reduction Theory Research Paper Lee's approval, but we have no way of really knowing for sure. Since I did not live during this time, I feel I Social Life In University unable to say Similarities Between The Help And To Kill A Mockingbird he was right or wrong. Please enter your name. Other editions. Mona Lisa vs.

TKAM \u0026 12AM - Essay Plan - Prejudice

Film producer and a Film Director. Working from home and working at an office. Linguist and a Grammarian. Developer or a Coder? QA Specialist or a Test Engineer. Dean or a Principal. Accountant vs. Journalist vs. Recruiter vs. HR Generalist. Copywriter vs. Content Marketer. Compare and contrast essay between two cultures Egypt and Mesopotamia compare and contrast essay Modern European and American culture.

Urbanism and ruralism. Vegetarianism vs. Compare and contrast Mexico and United States essay. Emo culture and gothic. Compare and contrast Sparta and Athens essay. Bookworms vs. Film Buffs. Culture and ethnicity. Christianity, Islam and Judaism essay. Interesting topics about literature Bible vs. Fahrenheit Chronicles of Narnia: Film or the book series? The Great Gatsby vs. The Catcher in the Rye. Fiction against non-fiction. Divine Comedy vs. Paradise Lost. Lord of the Rings: The book against the latest film production? Expository and Persuasive writing. Lord of the Rings. I am Malala. Classic poetry against the modern one. Paper books against the e-books: The never-ending battle.

Anne of Green Gables vs. Pride and Prejudice vs. Bronte sisters vs. Jane Austen. Drama and Comedy. To Kill a Mockingbird or The Help. Little Women vs. Little Men. Poetry and prose: What makes them different? Topics related to movies and cinematography Wolf of Wall Street vs. Great Gatsby. Main differences between European and American films. Horror films and thrillers. House M. Sherlock Holmes: The old series or the new episodes? Polyanna: Which is better — a film or the book?

Japanese horror films vs. Home Alone 1 vs. Home Alone 4. The Sound of Music vs. Mary Poppins. Beverly Hills, or Melrose Place. Friends vs. The Office. Charlie Chaplin and Mr. Romeo and Juliet: , , and productions. Lord of the Rings: extended edition vs. Ben-Hur vs. Ben-Hur Exodus: Gods and Kings and Prince of Egypt. Dunkirk vs. Saving Private Ryan. The Green Mile vs. The Shawshank Redemption. Les Miserables vs. The Greatest Showman. Music and arts-related topics Beyonce vs. Whitney Houston against Adele. Britney Spears against Madonna. Mona Lisa vs. Then, to choose a favorite or recommend a buy.

In some cases, it is sufficient to recommend buying different products based on different values. The writer can state that for an owner that places great value on food being organic and free of GMOs, option A is the best buy. While for a price sensitive buyer option C is the best buy. Using values and campaign promises for both a real life and fictional political race. In this example, the writer can introduce the topic by vaguely introducing the story. It would be fair to assume the reader would be familiar with the series. The writer can then introduce the characters that are either in the running — or should be in the running — for power in Westeros. The topic for this thesis could be something like the following.

However, only one will rule. This essay will evaluate each of these strong women. This comparison will be done through leadership skills, military prowess and political competence. This essay will determine which would be the most deserving ruler of the Seven Kingdoms. The body of an essay like this one could be split into three paragraphs, one for each female contender: Daenerys, Sanza and Cercei. To conclude, the writer should clearly designate a winner of who should rule between the three characters. They could also further entice the reader by mentioning other contenders for power in the series.

The model for this type of essay can also be used to analyze candidates for a real life political race or any competition. A compare and contrast article can also be used to point out the differences between two almost identical corporations and distinguish where people should be shopping at and why. In this example, the entity is grocery stores. The topic could be introduced as food is a necessity to life and continue on to the fact that anyone living in an urban center will use a grocery store.

The introduction could also include statistics on millennial poverty or facts about food insecurity. In an article like this, the structure could focus on the criteria the grocery stores are being compared on as opposed to writing one paragraph about Metro and one paragraph about No Frills. The first paragraph would be focused on price and compare costs for identical or similar products at each chain. The next paragraph would discuss the quality of food at each chain, perhaps focusing on specific categories, such as quality of meat.

The final paragraph would concentrate on the variety of food at each chain, such as specialty cheeses or pre-prepared dinners. My command of the English was good, but as with all younger teens, the symbolism of the book and its significance largely escaped me. I lacked the analytical skills to truly understand what it meant, what a landmark it was in terms of American history.

In 8th grade, before reading this book, our class studied American history. We studied slavery, the Civil War. We studied the ugly past of racism and segregation. We studied Martin Luther King. As a newly arrived immigrant, this should have made an impact on me, but again, I was so young that I didn't truly understand the significance. It was only later on, when I was older, that I understood how important this book was, and how remarkable the character of Atticus Finch was. He, and this book is an American institution. A symbol of righteousness in a past filled with racial injustice. A defender of the underdog. Which is why this book, this sequel to the iconic To Kill a Mockingbird is such a disappointment.

If I must be honest, it should never have been written, for in this book, the shining beacon that is Atticus Finch has been grossly tarnished. He has now grown old, bitter, and racist. Yes, I understand that people change. We all do. I understand that a good lawyer can present his case regardless of his beliefs, but that's not the point. The point is that Atticus Finch is such an outstanding figure that it feels wrong somehow to blacken his image. No pun intended. I've seen comparisons to how this book is the most anticipated book since the release of Harry Potter.

Well, what if J. Rowlings had released a sequel to Harry Potter, in which Harry is an old, grumpy man, going through a mid-life crisis, leering at young girls at the gym, cheating on his wife, ignoring his children? Nobody would like that. Some symbols are here to stay. Some things are meant to remain the way they are. Some things should remain pure.

I wish this book had been left to rot as an old, forgotten manuscript in some long-forgotten warehouse. I want to remember Atticus Finch as a paragon. Sometimes, I want simplicity, and I want bliss in ignorance. Feb 03, Diane Barnes rated it liked it Shelves: noble-bitches-book-club. If anything, it made me love it more. In my mind, it is even more of a masterpiece from having read it's predecessor, or, as Harper Lee herself described it, the parent of Mockingbird. And Harper Lee herself has lost no respect from me. The characters become even richer from seeing their future selves in Watchman. There are scenes and dialogue here that showed up in her later effort. She fleshed out some characters and limited others. And forget the hype about Atticus being a racist.

He was a product of his times who thought that the South was not ready for complete equality of the races. It was Alabama in , for goodness sake. He joined the Klan and went to a few meetings so he would know whose faces were under the hoods, in order to limit the harm they could do. All the newspaper articles about this book failed to mention that little detail. Atticus is still Atticus, but more of a human being here, less of a saint. Jean Louise has grown up, and like all kids in their 20's, thinks she knows everything.

Dill and Jem make appearances via flashbacks, and we see another side of Calpurnia. We should bow down in reverence to the editor who suggested to Lee that she tell the story from Scout's childhood perspective. It was a brilliant idea, Lee took the advice, and Mockingbird was brought into existence as the book so many of us have loved all our lives. This book, if published then, would never have achieved the fame and importance of Mockingbird. To finish, I am so glad I read this book.

I was apprehensive at first because I didn't want this one to ruin my love for Mockingbird, but as I said in the beginning, it made me love it more. It just goes to prove how much readers invest in literary characters who can sometimes become more real and influential that the people we actually live with. Feb 03, Stepheny rated it really liked it. I was pretty excited when I found out that this book was coming out. I was even more excited when it showed up at my house.

I believe the story that was told. No, I am not going to try to change your mind on the matter. I had the wonderful experience of reading To Kill a Mockingbird reread while reading this one. It is absolutely the best thing you could do. Reading them together allowed me to see it as one full story arc, rather than a book and its sequel. It truly read like one book to me. I realize Scout is the one telling it, but it felt like it was his story.

Scout is forced to face some harsh realities; realities that turn her world upside down. The hardest part of growing up is realizing the world is nothing like what you thought it was. I remember facing these realities myself and I remember the devastating blows it delivered. I think it was there all along, but that we were too blind to see it. Atticus defended him for the sake of justice. I still disagree with a lot of the claims that Atticus is a racist. I think Atticus understood the bigger picture; that we are only capable to do so much only so often. The time period was different, the mindset or collective conscious if you will, was different. It is hard for us to accept Atticus as a common person when we have held him on a pedestal in our hearts for so long.

As far as I am concerned, he is still on that pedestal. If anything, I have a higher respect for him now than I ever did, if only because he is now a flawed human being; his character more realistic, more substantial. Scout is coming to terms with these things in the only way she has ever come to terms with anything- by throwing every ounce of her being into it. She is passionate and relentless in her beliefs and I can only admire her for her voice. She speaks those very harsh truths to whoever will listen and she does so loud enough for all of Maycomb County to hear. How can they devoutly believe everything they hear in church and then say the things they do and listen to the things they hear without throwing up? It opens the story up and gives us a greater understanding of TKAM.

We are reunited with characters we love so innately that we feel their anguish as if it were our own. We get more tales of Scout and Jem as the young and reckless pair they were. The best thing you could do is read these two books together in hopes of seeing it as one. Jul 23, Will Byrnes rated it really liked it Shelves: fiction , american-history. Atticus Finch as racist. There it is. Atticus Finch, the embodiment of decency, brought to life in To Kill a Mockingbird , widely considered one of the greatest novels in American literature, magnificently brought to cinematic life by Gregory Peck in the film, defender of the powerless, dispenser of wisdom, a hero to generations of readers and movie-goers, spouting opinions that do or should make most folks cringe.

Here are a few samples: …You realize that our Negro Atticus Finch as racist. You will concede that? Do you want them in our world? So what are we to make of this? She sees the place where she grew up more clearly this time than she ever had before. She professes, based on her experience of having been brought up with exposure to all sorts, and having never been overtly taught to be a racist, to be someone who is color blind. That makes her unique in Maycomb, as everyone else has been very much aware of color all their lives. What comes as the biggest shock for JLF is seeing that her sainted father, a man everybody loves, and other people she cares for, despite their positive qualities, hold views that are shocking.

JLF struggles to come to terms with this realization. The crux of the story is how she deals with this. While she is already physically an adult, Jean Louise must cope with coming-of-age truths. JLF tries to reconcile her conscience with what she now sees, and realizes had been present all along. She is anguished by her internal conflict. With amazing memories of her childhood in this town, it is a huge part of who she is. In facing the possibility of rejecting her father and the place in which she became the person she is, she is faced with rejecting a part of herself and that is the core conflict of the story.

Harper Lee - from Smithsonian. There is real insight here into the local psyche, from a true local. Another strength of the book is the clear voice of JLF, Scout as a kid, particularly in her recollections of a glowing childhood. The voice of Scout will take you by the hand and lead you through. It is the same voice that appears in Mockingbird , warm, familiar and welcome. Jack offers a perspective that is definitely homegrown, but is also decorated with the baubles and gewgaws of an advanced education and unusual interests.

The affection between JLF and Jack is palpable. Her interaction with Henry, a friend since childhood, was kludgy. It felt forced. The scenes in which JLF confronts Atticus are powerful and even upsetting, but she lays into him without even asking what was up. I do recognize that many people, and particularly the young, jump to conclusions, but I wondered whether Scout, who is portrayed as a pretty bright person, would really be so close minded as to form an opinion, particularly so strong an opinion, based on unexamined evidence. There is also some wonderful, and playful use of language, although the content reflects some of the very not politically-correct zeitgeist of the era.

There are also beautiful passages that reflect the attachment Harper Lee, through her avatar, feels to her native soil. The political views on display are appalling, paternalistic, racist, sexist, homophobic, and do reflect the attitudes of the time and place depicted, I expect. But it galls to have characters portray their dark views as accepted wisdom and have far too much of that accepted by a character who should know better. In short, as a stand-alone there is much to like here, including some strong characters, a wonderful feel for place and a willingness to take on serious and controversial subject matter, but there are plenty of flaws as well. Go Set a Watchman is no classic. Of course Go Set a Watchman would not have become the literary event of had it not shared DNA with a novel widely regarded as one of the best American novels ever written, To Kill a Mockingbird.

And just in case you are newly arrived on our planet, perhaps are recently thawed out from an extended cryogenic holiday, or have just come to after a nasty crack on the head in , Mockingbird recounts, through the eyes of the grown-up Scout, a time when she was six years old and her father, Atticus Finch, was called on to defend a black man accused of raping a white woman. It offers a view of a golden childhood and a principled father taking on the bigotry of a deep South town in service of justice and decency. If you have not yet read it, go, scoot, scram, take a hike, go find a copy, and come back when you are done.

Ok, read it? There has certainly been a lively reaction to Go Set a Watchman. Would that reaction have been different if there had never been a Mockingbird baseline against which to compare this version of Atticus? That is something we can never know. Go Set a Watchman was Mockingbird 1. Harper Lee sold her book to the publisher JB Lippincott in But it was deemed not ready for prime time. I do not know the specifics of what editorial direction Lee was given by her editor, Tay Hohoff, other than to focus on the time of Jean Louise's childhood.

Racism is taken on very powerfully in 1. There is less telling and more showing in Mockingbird. The childhood recollections here, while wonderful, do not occupy as much of the stage as they do in version 2. In fact Mockingbird was intended to have been titled Atticus. There is danger, of course, that this original depiction of Atticus will forever tarnish the gleaming ideal of a man we admire so from Mockingbird. Why splash racist graffiti over a cherished icon? Actually the racist element was there from the start, in this 1.

In reviews and commentary some elements have been taken out of context and misrepresented. The KKK thing, for example. Atticus agrees that the author is a nut, and that he had been granted the right to speak at the town council, as any other nut might have. Atticus does not subscribe to the views in the pamphlet. He subscribes to enough, though, to cause all who know where his character ends up in version 2. You can get a taste of that in the quotes at the top of this review. It continues on, with nastiness about the NAACP, legalistic hogwash about SCOTUS violating the 10th Amendment, a general sense of feeling under assault by outside forces, and a paternalistic notion that all would be just fine if those northern rabble-rousers would just let Negro advancement proceed at a more measured pace.

This is crucial, I believe, to one of the strengths of Watchman. While the views held by the residents of Maycomb, as represented by Atticus, Henry and others, may not receive a universal welcome in , I believe they do fairly represent the beliefs of most educated southern whites during this era. The book might have been instructive to northerners, had it been released in its original form, as to the nature of the strident opposition the civil rights movement faced. As such, Watchman offers a valuable guide to a time and place, where even folks most at the time would consider pretty decent, like Atticus, maintained views that, while they remain widespread among some segments of our population today, are now generally seen as abhorrent.

There are other interesting elements that come from a consideration of the novels set side by side. What remains? What is lost? In Watchman it is a scene of horror as Jean Louise sees a racist propound his views in a public forum in which her father and friend are principal players. Calpurnia, the Finch housekeeper in Mockingbird plays a major role in Watchman as well. In one particularly chilling scene, Jean Louise, who had seen Cal as a nurturing force her entire life, now wonders if Cal ever really cared for her or, instead, saw her only through a racial lens.

Dill, her avatar for childhood pal Truman Capote, is present in both novels, but Boo Radley was added in Mockingbird. Henry is gone from Mockingbird. Go Set a Watchman may occupy a place in the shadow of what was to come, but it does offer insight into the author, her take on the world in the late s, and into her characters. As a blood relation to one of the greatest books in American literature, it is most definitely worth reading. View all 86 comments. Jul 14, Darth J rated it it was ok. Things change, people change, and the lens of our childhood perceptions can be clouded with a rose-tint that turns out to be not so consistent with reality.

You were an emotional cripple, leaning on him, getting the answers from him, assuming that your answers would always be his answers. The story is boring and meanders along with too many asides before ever making its point. View all 14 comments. Jul 15, Roxane rated it it was ok. I am going to write a full review I think but oh this is not a novel and it was not ready for public consumption. There is a faint glimmer of plot.

There IS something here but it is not coherent. It is not robust. This reads as notes toward something grand and that makes the book's current state that much more a travesty. View all 24 comments. Feb 03, Jessica Jeffers rated it liked it Shelves: fiction. From what I understand, this was the first draft of a book that Harper Lee submitted to her publisher in the late 50s. I was excited to read this because To Kill A Mockingbird is absolutely and without a doubt my favorite book. I was a reader long before I picked it up when I was 14, but it was the first book that made me stop and think about things like foreshadowing and character development. It was the first book that genuinely moved me because I was so invested in the characters as something more than just words on a page.

I know that's not a terribly unique opinion. So when this was announced, I knew it was either going to be wonderful or just so-so. I suspected that it was going to be the latter, given that Lee's editors initially sent her back to write a different version of the story, but I wanted to hold out hope that there was something good there. Also, I just wanted to form my own opinion about it. But I don't even know how to rate this, because my feelings are so complicated and varied. This is most definitely not a great book, but it feels unfair to criticize something that was never properly molded into anything.

By now, I think most people have at least read the headlines expressing horror that the Watchman version of Atticus is a segregationist. Not because people change with time or anything else like that that's already been written about in countless articles over the last few days. But because when Watchman was written in , the character Atticus Finch as we know and love him did not really exist yet.

There was a reason that the father in Go Set A Watchman held racist beliefs and it was so that Lee could tell a specific story, and that happens to be a very different story than the one she eventually told in Mockingbird. In this story, it seems clear to me that Lee -- through the semi-autobiographical voice of Scout -- wanted to find a way to come to terms with loving people who were Southern to the core while also realizing that there's much about the Southern Way of life that her new Northern peers found perplexing and distasteful. I think I agree with my husband when he said to me that perhaps this should have been included as a supplement to a new version of Mockingbird released sometime down the road, the kind of thing in which the author of the foreword of the afterword examines how the characters became something different.

I don't know. Maybe this shouldn't have been published as a separate book, but I think there's some small value in seeing how these characters transformed. There's some references to things that ultimately got fleshed out in Mockingbird : a few-sentence summary of what eventually became Tom Robinson's trial though, in this version, Atticus won that case , summers with Dill, the colorful citizens of Maycomb. I can totally see why an editor might zero in on these things and say to Harper Lee, "That's a better story. Let's examine that instead. In the first half of the book, there's a heavy sense of condemnation regarding the Southern way of life. Scout's been living in New York for several years and is kind of disappointed to go back home and see her small town through a changed lens.

She remembers Atticus being polite to the black folks in town, noting that he defended Tom Robinson despite potential damage to his reputation not because he wanted to save the black man but because he saw a blatant miscarriage of justice. She thinks to herself, "I didn't grow up to be racist. Someone taught me to not be a racist, but how can it be the people in this small Alabama town who are saying really awful things about black people? How can it be my father, who is sitting in meetings with men who so viciously hate black people?

The plot itself is messy and unformed -- but that's because this is a largely unedited version of a manuscript that was essentially rejected by the publisher in Well, really, it seems her editor saw potential and instructed her to go in a different direction but for all intents and purposes I see that as a rejection of the story being told here. There are some really lovely passages throughout this book and it gave me a lot to think about. I think it's also really hard to wrap your brain around the intent here without the context of what was going on in Alabama in the late '50s — I certainly struggled with that myself.

If nothing else, this book really made me want to go back and read every Harper Lee biography I can find in an attempt to get a clearer picture of what she was trying to do as a writer. I just found myself wanting more context. I found myself completely uncertain as to what the takeaway of this book was supposed to be, exactly. She wrote this one, maybe-perfect book that's come to be seen as a bastion of racial tolerance and justice In the book the movie differed in this regard I always saw the trial of Tom Robinson as the context for this, the backdrop that steered the plot into a conflict that allowed a small girl in the South to learn these lessons. One of the reasons this alternative universe is lacking in the magic of Mockingbird is definitely the absence of the precocious, yet innocent, point of view of young Scout.

I think this is worth reading as a study of how characters and plot and setting are informed by one another, and I think this is worth reading so you can form your own opinions. If this book disappoints you, I hope you can use that disappointment as a reminder of what was so great about the first one. View all 50 comments. The whole cast of some old sitcom get together and you just spend the whole time thinking about how old everybody looks. However, Atticus has changed in these years and now hold views and opinions that greatly upset Jean Louise. That's basically it. Reading the first page of this novel you are immediately dropped into the familiar prose and voice of Lee's masterwork.

Maycomb is alive again in your hands. The novel simmers along at a steady pace as Jean Louise reminisces about her childhood in the town and about her life now. Then about half-way through the plot turns as we discover about what Atticus has been up to. The rest of the book is spent with Jean Louise trying to comprehend her father's new views and it fizzles out after that. The ending of this was far too saccharine for my liking. TKAM was brutal at parts but there is no brutality in this book.

It takes a fairly safe and maudlin approach to telling its story. I wouldn't call it bland but it is certainly quite vanilla. However, if we look past these minor qualms we still have a thoroughly enjoyable novel by one of the 20th century's most celebrated writers. Celebrate that. TKAM purists might hiss and groan at the mere existence of this book, but don't listen to them. This is a good book. View all 21 comments. Jul 14, Petra X sees life thru a veil of fruit fly specks rated it really liked it Shelves: read , reviews , fiction , reviewed. So we all felt that praise was due to Atticus in Mockingbird because he defended a black kid accused of rape, unsuccessfully.

And we all fell about slathering and slobbering with joy that such a wonderful example of humanity could have come out of such racist times. So much so it's a standard school curriculum book. But we were wrong. He didn't defend the kid from any feeling of the equal humanity of blacks and whites. Not a bit, Atticus was a member of the Ku Klux Klan and a firm racist, absolut So we all felt that praise was due to Atticus in Mockingbird because he defended a black kid accused of rape, unsuccessfully. Not a bit, Atticus was a member of the Ku Klux Klan and a firm racist, absolutely convinced of the inferiority of blacks. What worried him in Watchman with another, similar case and presumably in Mockingbird, was that if the accused black person didn't get representation from him or another white lawyer then the NAACP would come in with their clever lawyers and arguments and insist on black people on the jury.

And then the status quo would be upset, blacks would get ideas, the whole town might be forced to change and there would be no guarantee that the accused would be found guilty. That is why O. Simpson got off. It wasn't a case of guilt or innocence, it was that people, black people, had had enough. What was one guilty person not convicted compared to the huge numbers, the excessive percentage of blacks filling the prisons in the US for crimes that whites.. If you firmly believe that the prisons in the US are overwhelming black because blacks commit disproportionately more crimes than whites and need to be locked up with much harsher sentences than whites, then you and I have nothing to say to each other and if you aren't a paid-up member of the KKK, then you are in spirit.

I've rewritten my review of To Kill a Mockingbird in the light of knowing that this book was the first draft for it and seeing that Atticus was no kind of saint, but the very opposite. Then you read that the food stylist that did it used mayonnaise because real icecream would melt and what the fuck does it matter if you were fooled.

Why not follow their example and place your order today? On the other hand, I was disappointed with the shallowness and one-dimensionality of her beau, Henri Clinton, the absence of my favorite character Boo Radley, and the vapid conclusion which seemed to be about fighting racism from within the KKK or Citizen's Councils. Publishing Go Set a Watchman is John Rawls Individualism a money-making stunt by the people who control Similarities Between The Help And To Kill A Mockingbird estate. Similarities Between The Help And To Kill A Mockingbird topic for this thesis could be Similarities Between The Help And To Kill A Mockingbird like the following. Great Gatsby. The climax of the novel is the argument between Jean Louise and Atticus, but, not having the context of Mockingbird, Atticus is a completely flat character. If nothing else, this book really made me want Similarities Between The Help And To Kill A Mockingbird go back and read Similarities Between The Help And To Kill A Mockingbird Harper Lee biography I can find in an Similarities Between The Help And To Kill A Mockingbird to get a clearer picture of what she was trying to do as a writer.

Current Viewers: