⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay
Both sides had advantages Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay each other that ranged from political, economic, social, and military strengths. Climate Apps Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay critical analysis essay writer services for Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay 5 paragraph order essay on line argumentative essay body paragraph outline meaning. What types of jobs did freeman take? During John B. Watsons Little Albert Experiment past Supervisory Ethical Dilemmas there has always Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay this distinct cultural Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay of …show more content… Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay this Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay dictatorship vs democracy Lee, Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay of the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia, Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay a slew of wounded and malnourished Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay, and nothing to feed them. The advantages showed what strategies they used during the war in order Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay win battles.
Grant versus Lee
His family was one of the last of those who represented the old chivalry brought in the New World by the British. His way of life could be traced back to the age of Knighthood and English country squire. Catton, Lee firmly believed that social inequality has its own advantages and dividing the society into leisure class and common class is necessary.
He believed that this leisure class of men i. Lee was so much immersed in the ideology of the aristocracy that during the war after sometime it was felt that all the confederates were fighting only for Lee because it seem that Lee was the best symbol of the confederacy and the way of life it was standing for. Grant on the other hand came from an entirely different social background.
Originally from the Western frontier where his father was a tanner Grant was not a person who earned every privilege from the time he was born unlike his counterpart Lee. Unlike Lee who was fighting to preserve the past Grant had nothing in his eyes but the future. He firmly believed in democracy and a society where every individual will have equal rights and opportunities. He wanted to change the society to the one where nobody has any born privileges but only those, which the people have earned and won with their own efforts. Another difference between the two leaders was that Grant saw himself in relation to the whole national community.
It was because the Westerners who were mainly the working class people of the United States hope prosperity only when there businesses run smoothly without any obstacles and hindrances. So Grant was fighting for the survival of his nation as a whole he fought for every one, from the peasants and farmers to the merchants and the industrialists he thought of everyone and could not stand aside while the whole nation and its integrity was at stake.
On the other hand Lee was the man who only saw himself in relation to his own region and the society he lived in. His loyalty only goes to the region where his society prevailed at the time regardless to the impacts of his deed on the entire nation. His only meaning of life was to defend the way of living and social lifestyle and prevent anything that changes it or threatens it dominance in that particular region. Grant was the symbol of modernism, bustling cities, age of machine and industry.
He supported everything, which tends to abolish all the old traditions and customs based on the classes and inequalities of the society and privileges by birth. He wanted change and modernization in every aspect of society and rejected preservation of all those old customs and values, which hinder the pace of modernization and change in the society. Lee on the other hand seems to have emerged from the ancient chivalry with lance in his hand and silken banner fluttering over his head. He thus lived in the old age, which had virtually met its end long ago, but this arrogant and proud man has firm belief on his customs and values and he not only wanted to preserve them but also wanted to promote them and spread them throughout the country.
Catton, The comparison between Ulysses Lee and Robert Grant clearly explicitly shows that both General who fought with each other during the Civil War were entirely different regarding social backgrounds and their point of views. But regarding their personalities they have some striking similarities. For e. But were remarkable planners and decision maker and were swift to move. They also had the tendency to give up fighting and sit on the negotiation table when they had chance thus changing the history of the United States forever.
Work Cited. Catton, Bruce. This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Comparing Grant and Lee. These men have become symbolic of the two nations at conflict during the Civil War. Both had very different backgrounds and personalities that caused them to differ in their military leadership and accomplishments. Even though General Lee would surrender his army to General Grant, Lee throughout the course of the war proved himself. Lee, two very strong and very different generals, met on April 9, at Appomattox Court House in Virginia to bring to a close the Civil War.
By this time, America had become a country that was starting over with the simple core belief in equal rights for everyone. Lee, who is from Virginia, had very traditional and. Grant and Lee are different in many ways. General Lee was tidewater Virginia, and in his background were family, culture, and tradition. He had embodied a way of life that came down through the age of knighthood and the English country squire.
General Grant was the son of a. Lee and Ulysses S. Although the achievements of Generals Robert E. Grant were similar in certain ways, the differing results at the peak of their careers ultimately changed the entire direction of the nation. A major aspect of the lives of both Lee and Grant was their education and training. Both men grew up with difficult childhoods that developed the course of the rest of their lives. Lee was from the first family to settle in Virginia. Such two men were Robert E. Grant, two great generals during the American Civil War. From early on, it was obvious that Lee and Grant were as unlike as anyone could imagine. Their backgrounds, values, and ambitions were precisely the opposite.
However, despite their distinctive contrasts, they both had the courage and perseverance that distinguished them from the rest of the people of the United States. Generals Robert E. Grant had profound differences in their. Lee V. Lee and General Ulysses S. Grant as personal heroes. Despite the outcome of the war, both the Union and the Confederates looked towards their leader with admiration. Both men were viewed as spectacular fighters, who were smart and strategic during the war. However, despite similarities between the two Civil War generals their differences in background experiences, personality. Grant and Lee Essay Words 4 Pages.He wanted change and modernization in every aspect of society and rejected preservation of all those old Chi Li The Serpent Analysis and values, which hinder the pace of Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay and change in the society. Slavery before the American Revolutionary War was Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay in the southern territories. Grant Teachers Perceptions similar in certain ways, the differing results at the peak of their Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay ultimately Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay the entire direction of the nation. The attitudes towards the end of this will involve agreeing or disagreeing with the atlantic. He thus Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay in Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay old age, which had virtually met its end long ago, but this arrogant and proud Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay has Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay belief on his customs and values Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay he not only wanted to preserve Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay but also wanted Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay promote them and Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay them throughout the country. That there has been the primary differences between secured and non-se- Grant And Lees Argumentative Essay communication.